Dallas Buyers Club tells the story of
Ron Woodruff (Matthew McConaughy), an electrician, bull rider, and hustler who,
after being diagnosed with AIDS, violates an FDA ban on importing drugs from
Mexico. While Dallas Buyers Club deserves
credit for tackling such a recent and deeply troubling subject matter—the1980s
AIDS crisis and its corresponding homophobia and bigotry—it fails to rise to
the challenge presented by the subject matter. There is a great movie somewhere
in Dallas Buyers Club, but ultimately
the film relies too much on Hollywood cliché than saying something
meaningful.
The
movie’s strength lie in the performances of McConaughy as Woodruff and Jared
Leto as Rayon, a transsexual AIDS patient and later Woodruff’s business
partner. Both underwent startling physical transformations to play their roles
(Step 1 towards winning an Oscar). McConaughy channels all of his charm and
confidence into his performance as Woodruff. He ably plays Woodruff’s cockiness
and charisma in battling the FDA, the reluctant Dallas gay community, and
winning over the affections of a hospital doctor, Eve (Jennifer Garner). His
performance, however, troublingly transforms Woodruff’s own homophobia and
bigotry into a side note—something that needs overcoming rather a significant
obstacle towards sympathizing with his character. In their scenes together,
Leto matches McConaughy’s charisma with a startling energy and determination.
He refuses to allow McConaughy’s star power to gobble up the entire screen. He
offers a sympathetic portrayal of a transsexual woman in an era that
discriminated against anyone who challenged prescribed gender and sexual roles.
While McConaughy and Leto offer compelling performances, the rest of the film fails to meet the challenge of its subject matter. In telling the story of Woodruff, a heterosexual man, who becomes a pioneer in battling the stigma of AIDS, the film relies on Hollywood paternalistic tropes of a “normal” person standing up for the oppressed minority—for examples look at some recent Oscar nominated films: white lady saves black kid (The Blind Side), white man ends slavery (Lincoln), or white lady supports civil rights (The Help). Rather than showing how gay and lesbian activists challenged bigotry and oppression, we have Matthew McConaughy, the embodiment of a rugged and heterosexual masculine identity, leading the charge. At the end of the film, Woodruff’s patients cheer and celebrate him for standing up to the FDA. The majority of AIDS victims in the film spend their time waiting in lines to get drugs from Woodruff—seeking a cure from the straight white man. As Woodruff fights the FDA, the plot of the film descends into a tried and true narrative of man against uncaring and crooked institution.
While McConaughy and Leto offer compelling performances, the rest of the film fails to meet the challenge of its subject matter. In telling the story of Woodruff, a heterosexual man, who becomes a pioneer in battling the stigma of AIDS, the film relies on Hollywood paternalistic tropes of a “normal” person standing up for the oppressed minority—for examples look at some recent Oscar nominated films: white lady saves black kid (The Blind Side), white man ends slavery (Lincoln), or white lady supports civil rights (The Help). Rather than showing how gay and lesbian activists challenged bigotry and oppression, we have Matthew McConaughy, the embodiment of a rugged and heterosexual masculine identity, leading the charge. At the end of the film, Woodruff’s patients cheer and celebrate him for standing up to the FDA. The majority of AIDS victims in the film spend their time waiting in lines to get drugs from Woodruff—seeking a cure from the straight white man. As Woodruff fights the FDA, the plot of the film descends into a tried and true narrative of man against uncaring and crooked institution.
Yet
within the film lay the potential for a much more meaningful story. The AIDS
crisis of the 1980s produced frightening levels of bigotry, homophobia, and
blatantly false information about the spread of HIV. President Reagan refused
to call the disease by its name. The American government’s lack of response to
the crisis remains a stain on the history of America in the 1980s. The gay
rights movement, begun in earnest in the 1960s, gained traction by protesting
discrimination and homophobia. The film attempts to capture some of this fear
and paranoia, but fails to fully grasp it. After learning of his diagnosis,
Woodruff’s rodeo buddies recoil in horror at the prospect of even touching him.
They pelt him with homophobic slurs. The scenes, however, come across more as acknowledgments
of the era’s bigotry than effectively recapturing it. Instead of spending more
time on this part of the AIDS crisis, the film has Woodruff woe Eve, the female
doctor (whose character remains horribly underdeveloped), fly around the world
looking for drugs, and battle the FDA in court. Rayon, meanwhile, sells her
life insurance policy in order help Woodruff stay in business—the ultimate
selfless act by an oppressed minority to help her paternalist benefactor.
Dallas Buyers Club warrants praise for
addressing a dark and disturbing part of American history. Yet it squanders the
opportunity to tell a meaningful or challenging version of that story. It instead
settles for a comforting and safe history of an era that was neither.
No comments:
Post a Comment